Is Jonathan Franzen the greatest writer who’s ever written?

Jonathan Franzen can kiss my ass while I’m passing gas, but I mean no disrespect to the man or his work.

Several years ago, I tried to read a novel by Jonathan Franzen, and didn’t make it to the end of the second chapter. But, hey, what do I know? I’ve also given up on novels by F Scott Fitzgerald and Ernest Hemingway. Clearly great literature is a concept unfamiliar to me.

Jonathan Franzen topples critics like a drunken pinsetter at a bowling alley. In every magazine, newspaper, and website, there’s relentless praise for Jonathan Franzen. In the Washington Post, a review of his new book actually, seriously, honestly opens with the line, “Thank God for Jonathan Franzen.”

It’s unanimous that Jonathan Franzen is more brilliant than the midday Sahara sun, so I must’ve been mistaken when his book fell out of my lap and I started snoring. Jonathan Franzen must be a very, very good writer — thank God! — but I’m skeptical that he’s writing for me, or anyone like me. Clearly he’s writing for normal people, and that’s not me.

Did you know that a lot of “big-time writing” does not exist until someone in a suit sees potential profit in it? Successful authors submit proposals, not manuscripts, and they usually won’t begin writing until a publisher is lined up and contracts are signed. If an author’s proposal doesn’t sell to a publisher, that book simply isn’t written.

If the contract is signed and the book is written, it’ll then be edited and re-edited, and well-paid professionals will plan the marketing. In all the stark raving reviews for Jonathan Franzen’s books, successful marketing is what I see, more than art, passion, or literature.

Sometimes, giving up on a boring book, I wonder whether it was more interesting before the editors sandblasted away everything that was quirky or personal or passionate in it.

I prefer quirky and personal, and I’d rather discover a writer whose name the world doesn’t yet know, than be the X-millionth reader of the next book by Jonathan Franzen.

You’re probably thinking I’m bonkers about all this, and you’re probably right. You’ll say, I should at least read a few paragraphs of a second book by Jonathan Franzen, before airing my almost-entirely-uninformed opinion. To that I’d say bite me, but this isn’t about Jonathan Franzen. Thank God for Jonathan Franzen!

What grates me with steel wool is the marketing of literature, and the unanimity of judgment that one author is Great, or The Greatest, or Among The Greatest.

Whether great or merely good or gawdawful, which writers we read should be a conversation, an argument — not pronounced as a plain fact, or a prayer of hosanna to the heavens.

I’m sure some of the masterpieces are terrific, but I’d rather read something that millions of other people aren’t reading. Maybe something that’s not a product, like a new flavor of Coke.

Maybe, though, today is one of the frequent times when I’m full of shit. If your life was enraptured by Jonathan Franzen’s writing, please speak up. I’d take your recommendation more seriously than all the reviews in The New Yorker and Harper’s and Publisher’s Weekly and The New York Times and Esquire and The Atlantic and AV Club … 

10/6/2021
Republished 3/4/2025

25 responses to “Is Jonathan Franzen the greatest writer who’s ever written?”

  1. Captain Hampockets Avatar
    Captain Hampockets

    Just an anecdote – I've given up on plenty of books partway through. The most recent, and the fastest I've given up, was American Psycho. My god, it was attempting to be capital-L Literature, and the prose was fucking awful. I quit after fewer than 3 pages, I think. Go to the Amazon page, you can read the first few pages and see.

  2. Knut99 Avatar
    Knut99

    You are a very good writer Doug, but do I detect some sour grapes over Franzen's success?

    1. Captain Hampockets Avatar
      Captain Hampockets

      Doug had at least one GOOD offer of a toehold in the "Literature" realm. If he still has the original Pathetic Life issues, it'll come up eventually.

      His grapes are not sour. Rather a piquant smoothness.

    2. Doug Holland Avatar

      Captain, I give up on 2/3 of the books I read. Thank cripes for the library.

      Knut99, your suspicion is understandable but nope. I like good reading, and hold no grudge against good writing.

      Captain again, I had to look up piquant to be sure, but thank you.

  3. Jeff Meyer Avatar

    Jonathan Franzen sucks a donkey's ass! I try not to read any living writer – especially if they didn't already publish before, say, 1980 – it only leads to frustration and resentment. Some modern books I have liked and recommend (your mileage may vary):

    Endless Love – Scott Spencer – No joke, this is one of the best books of the last 50 years. Has maybe my all time favorite opening and ending. Not just about love (not really about love at all, actually) but obsession, crime, family, politics, etc. It's also one of the most sexually explicit books I've ever read from a mainstream publisher; there's a 75-page (!) love scene that is basically the climax of the book that compares favorably to David Cronenberg's bloodiest, goriest films. Never seen the movie, don't care — I can only laugh when I think of all the teenaged girls that unsuspectingly pick up this book. At the same time it's one of the tenderest stories I've read.

    The Enthusiast – Charlie Haas – Very funny, very sad, very dry. Hard to explain. Set in the world of itinerant magazine publishing but feels more like zines to me.

    Wish Her Safe at Home – Stephen Benatar – Character study of mental illness and sociopathy. Thought I would hate it but loved it. Like Mike Leigh's Naked but with a polite female protagonist and PBS/BBC veneer. Deceptively disturbing.

    Song of Kali – Dan Simmons – Favorite modern horror novel, bar none. Probably a bit xenophobic, blah blah blah, but criticisms like that miss the point: the utter despair and degredation and misanthropy of the main character, a writer who thinks he's worldy.

    1. Doug Holland Avatar

      Thanks for the suggestions, added to the list. It's a long list, though, including a few novels purchased months ago and still unopened in the package they came in. I'm currently reading the short story (expanded to a book with lots of white space) that The Day the Earth Stood Still was based on. Great movie, and I am *astounded* by how bad the source material is.

    2. Jeff Meyer Avatar

      Didn't realize TDTEST wasn't an original screenplay. I like the film but think it's a little didactic, which keeps it outside of my favorites.

      Recent sci-fi films have been atrocious (since the early 1980s!) but three good ones come to mind (briefly, because I could go on forever about this subject, and no one wants that):

      PREDESTINATION — Based on one of Heinlein's most radical and interesting short stories. Excellent time travel story with very tight structure but which nonetheless pays more attention to the human consequences rather than plot pyrotechnics. Ethan Hawke is good, but Sarah Snook gives one of my favorite female performances ever in a genre film. I'm not an "avoid spoilers" guy, but if you haven't already seen this, it's best to go in blind — again, not because of plot mechanics but because the emotional and identity quandaries in the film really hit harder that way. I figured out what was going on about halfway through, but I was so surprised the filmmakers had the balls to follow through with it that it deeply affected me.

      PRIMER — Low-budget ($7000?!) but beautifully made, extraordinarily intelligent time travel story. Ambiguous and disturbing. Interesting analog for the entire internet/ponzi era of "making something out of nothing". His next film UPSTREAM COLOR is also great.

      COMPUTER CHESS — Hilarious and ultimately surreal historical look at early computing/artificial intelligence. He made another film (not SF) called RESULTS which I also loved, starring the great Kevin Corrigan.

    3. Doug Holland Avatar

      Man, I like your taste in movies!

      That's fair about The Day the Earth Stood Still. It's basically "teaching us a lesson" in disguise. I'm not even sure I like the lesson, but for its genre — old-school sci-fi with Something To Say — it's a favorite for me.

      Primer is brilliant but more brilliant than me. It's complicated. I've seen it three times, and still haven't quite figured out the story, but always enjoyed it and it's time to see it again. Maybe this time I'll figure it out!

      I saw Computer Chess a few years
      ago, and today I'm surprised when
      Google tells me it's from 2013.
      It's so authentically "early era
      computers" I was misremembering it
      as having been much older, "filmed on location" in the 1980s or 90s.

      I may have seen Predestination too, but I'm not sure. You've kept the details under wraps (and I appreciate that!) and the title is also kind of non-distinct, so I've added it to my list.

    4. Captain Hampockets Avatar
      Captain Hampockets

      Computer Chess was the most boring movie I ever saw in the theater. Not the worst, but the most boring.

  4. eel paradise Avatar
    eel paradise

    I like most or all of his books…

    1. Doug Holland Avatar

      What’s the best Franzen in your opinion, and do you thank God for Jonathan Franzen?

      One ? is serious, one ? isn’t.

  5. johnthebasket Avatar
    johnthebasket

    2025 – I’m a reader. I read about 40 books a year, and I have been reading “adult” books since I was about 12. That’s about 650 books and that seems a little low. I read about 2/3 non-fiction (much of it science and music/cultural history) and 1/3 of it fiction (much of it detective fiction). I’ve never felt compelled to read a Jonathan Franzen book, but should I feel so compelled, I now know where the book review belongs. I’d guess I’ve read about 20 Kinky Friedman books. I’ve enjoyed most of them, but understand why some people don’t. Maybe it’s that way with Jonathan Franzen. I’m not chomping at the bit, but sometime in the next year, I’ll try to pick up a Franzen. You’ll be the first to get my review.

    as always,

    John

    1. Doug Holland Avatar

      By golly yes and please, read a Jonathan Franzen and get back to me. I expect it’ll be good, because books that aren’t good don’t get the universal praise, but I’m skeptical it’ll be outstanding, because anything outstanding would have less than the universal appeal Franzen seems to have. Which I probably should’ve said in the essay, but obviously it was a rant more than anything.

      40 X 58 (‘cuz I think you’re 70) = 2,320. That’s a lot of bit-chomping, more than 650.

      1. johnthebasket Avatar
        johnthebasket

        I’m 75 and cannot multiply . . . hell, I can barely add. Hi, I’m johnthebasket and I have a multiplication problem. That should be a hit at the meetings for the arithmetically impaired. I can subtract a little, but I occasionally end up with a negative number, and on a long weekend, an imaginary one. The square root of negative 1 multiplied by any real number is unreal. I could go on, but I lost the point. Long ago.

        john

        1. Doug Holland Avatar

          This is not math class, heh heh, and I wouldn’t have mentioned the numbers except that you said the tally seemed low.

          75! Happy? Five more happy birthdays than I’d thought!

          1. johnthebasket Avatar
            johnthebasket

            Happy might be stretching it. More like feeling like provoking fisticuffs:

            Asserted:

            The 20s and 30s were the time of the book: The Thin Man / The Big Sleep

            The 50s and 60s were the time of the movie: Dr. Strangelove / 2001: A Space Odyssey

            The 90s and aughts were the time of television: Homicide: Life on the Street / The Wire

            jtb

            1. johnthebasket Avatar
              johnthebasket

              I’ll be really disappointed if someone discovers that Jonathan Franzen was a gofer or buttboy on one of those TV shows.

              jtb

              1. johnthebasket Avatar
                johnthebasket

                The opening paragraph of Red Harvest, Hammett’s second best book . . .

                I first heard Personville called Poisonville by a red-haired mucker named Hickey
                Dewey in the Big Ship in Butte. He also called his shirt a shoit. I didn’t think
                anything of what he had done to the city’s name. Later I heard men who could
                manage their r’s give it the same pronunciation. I still didn’t see anything in it but
                the meaningless sort of humor that used to make richardsnary the thieves’ word
                for dictionary. A few years later I went to Personville and learned better.

                jtb

                1. Doug Holland Avatar

                  That’s literature.

  6. Henry L. Racicot Avatar

    Donald Ray Pollock’s *Knockemstiff* is good. I can’t think of any other living American writer who has written any good literary fiction this century. There are a few good genre writers, but not any great ones. Thomas H. Cooke writes some good grim thrillers, *Instruments of Night* was real good. Ronald Malfi wrote a decent horror novel *Black Mouth.*

    1. Doug Holland Avatar

      If it’s a list of writers worth reading, it ought to include Henry Racicot.

      Knockemstiff was already on my library reserve list, recommended by a bum on the bus a few months back, but due to the cosmic coincidence of another recommendation I’ve bumped it up the list, thanks. Or, danks.

      1. Claude Reigns Avatar
        Claude Reigns

        Samuel Delany’s “Hogg” is the greatest novel ever written

        1. Doug Holland Avatar

          Gets surprisingly so-so ratings at ‘Goodreads’, which is a strong endorsement indeed. Added to my library list.

    2. johnthebasket Avatar
      johnthebasket

      Why look to this century? Last century was a pretty good one for the book. Check it out. And why in god’s name does fiction have to be “literary”? “Catch-22” and “Slaughterhouse-Five” should be on anybody’s best novels ever list.

      John

      1. Doug Holland Avatar

        ‘Literary’ does have highfalutin implications, I guess. Not sure how I usually use it, but this morning it means, to me, ‘worth reading’. Then again, I’m sure MOBY DICK has literary merit, so the definition must be more nuanced than that.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 512 MB. You can upload: image, audio. Drop file here

In defense against spam and bots, comments with attachments or multiple links require my approval, which might delay things.