One last look at the 2024 election

This will, I promise, be my last article-length attempt to wrap my fat head around the stupidities of the 2024 election. I am not going to go all-pundit all the time.

♦ ♦ ♦

When Donald Trump won in 2016, you could plausibly argue that he was a fresh face, and voters didn’t know what they were getting. Eight years later, he’s very familiar. For your next president, America has knowingly elected an always-angry born-rich billionaire with a solid-gold suitcase stuffed with startlingly cruel ideas. And he won by 5-million votes.

In this first week after the election, Trump has made half a dozen cabinet nominations, each of them comic-book evil and emphatically wrong for the job — the only requirements for anyone Trump would nominate. He’s also asked for the unconstitutional abrogation of Senate confirmation hearings, a demand immediately agreed to by his Republican Party’s leadership, who control the Senate.

And with that, Trump’s Project 2025 is underway, rewriting the USA as something uglier than it’s been in my lifetime.

But why did America vote for this? That’s my question, and here’s my answer, in four parts:

① Many Americans have no empathy — no concern or no ability to care about other people’s problems. Show them kids growing up hungry, a beggar on the street, a stranger coughing up blood but unable to afford a doctor, and these people do not give a damn. Can’t quantify how many of these people walk among us, but anyone with two eyes and a heart can see that not caring is the American way.

There are fancy words for this lack of empathy — psychopath or sociopath, or maybe Vulcan — but those are loaded terms, saying more than I want to say. It’s not intended as an insult, just a fact: Most Republicans lack empathy. That’s the base of their political party.

② The Democratic Party has been marching steadily to the right since the 1960s, doing it doubletime since the ’90s, and if you’re an actual leftist, the Democratic ticket for 2024 offered nothing.

Harris’s campaign rushed rightward to pile up endorsements from Republicans, without a whisper about universal health care, or breaking up giant corporations, or anything more than a tiny token tax increase for billionaires. Harris refused to say she’d even reconsider aid to governments actively engaged in war crimes. Universal basic income and ranked choice voting weren’t mentioned. She spoke to a right-tilted middle, not to the left.

That’s because the Democratic Party’s only purpose is fundraising. They did a great job, too — the Harris campaign brought in and wasted more money than any political campaign in US history. To the people in charge at the Democratic Party, that’s victory; the election is immaterial. Harris had nothing to say to the left, because anything that might cost the party fundraising opportunities from the center and right, even if it would win votes and elections, is disallowed.

③ Harris offered diddlysquat to people who are hurting.

On 10/23, two weeks before the end of the campaign, she came out for raising the minimum wage to $15 p/hour — something first proposed so long ago (2014, I think) that by now $15 p/hour is nowhere near what’s needed.

Only in platitudes (if at all) did she mention patching the safety net that barely exists for the unemployed, the sick, the disabled. Or complete medical and student debt forgiveness. Or worker’s rights. Or rent control. Or the cost of groceries.

To people literally dying of corporate capitalism, Harris’s mantra was, “You’re wrong — everything’s pretty good, just look at our charts!”

④ Last and most obviously, the media decided the election, well before it got underway. Even as someone who reflexively distrusts corporate news, it’s been jawdropping to see.

For making a few confused statements in his debate against Trump, Joe Biden was portrayed as the oldest, weakest, most intellectually infirm president we’ve ever had, and whatever will the Democrats do about having him on the ticket?

Trump makes a lengthy speech with no two sentences connected to a third, says the most inane, unintelligible blather, makes up lies that aren’t even plausible or possible, insults anyone who’s annoyed him in the previous week, with racism and sexism always on display … And from that, The New York Times will distill a phrase here or half a sentence there, and report that Trump proposed a new tariff.

It’s understandable that voters informed only by such media headlines might vote for Trump, so he’s finally, accidentally right about something: The news media is the enemy.

♦ ♦ ♦

And those were the circumstances under which Kamala Harris got 9-million fewer votes than Joe Biden got four years ago, while Donald Trump gained 1-million more than in 2020, to win handily. About 8-million fewer Americans voted this time, than last time.

Where did everyone else go? They weren’t invited, so they stayed home.

And the only person I won’t particularly blame is Kamala Harris, because why bother? She’s politically blah, always has been, but she wasn’t in charge of her campaign’s strategy any more than she would’ve been in charge in the White House.

♦ ♦ ♦

Harris (once) called Trump a fascist and (constantly) said he’s a threat to democracy, but having lost the election, President Biden and VP Harris now welcome our new insect overlords. They’re moving toward a peaceful transition of power, without any complaint.

I don’t expect or suggest that they should refuse to concede or cooperate, like Trump did in 2020. But if democracy and the constitution and the American way of life are in peril — and they are — and if Trump is a fascist — and he is — then it is incumbent on the incumbents to say it out loud. They should be speaking against Trump, sounding an alarm as he begins building his Second Reich.

They’ll say nothing, though, until it’s at a $5,000-a-plate chicken dinner, because Biden and Harris and their ilk are not in charge and never have been. They’re middle-management for the oligarchy, that’s all, and the oligarchy wants what’s coming.

11/12/2024

itsdougholland.com
← PREVIOUS NEXT →


25 responses to “One last look at the 2024 election”

  1. Claude Reigns Avatar
    Claude Reigns

    I despise them all.

      1. Claude Reigns Avatar
        Claude Reigns

        Trump’s cabinet looks more and more like a Halloween party with every new addition. Elon Musk heads the “Department of Government Efficiency”? Fuck this shit.

        1. Doug Holland Avatar

          Every announcement is an eyeroll. I go, hmmm, is there anyone worse he could’ve chosen? The answer is always no.

          Curious to see what powers will be bestowed on the Muskman, who will doubtless continue as CEO for his half-dozen swindles.

  2. granville Avatar
    granville

    Agree on everything here, well written post-mortem.

    It is really weird to me that if you ask people about “progressive policy” that they actually see, they’ll mention something like raising the threshold for felony theft up to $1000 in various cities. Not child care, rent control, or Tim Walz’s most popular program which was free lunch for every single kid going to public school without exception or means-testing. Cuz they didn’t do any of those things and they didn’t even hint that they would. I’m not a normie but normies like things that help them. This was a massive failure of this “progressive era” which seems like it’s definitely coming to a close, at least in terms of making any kind of policy (and we got some in Biden’s admin, like I said before.) It’ll come back. Hopefully we’re smarter.

    “Where did everyone else go? They weren’t invited, so they stayed home.”

    That is incredibly well said!

    1. Doug Holland Avatar

      Why thanks man.

      The justification for government is to give a hand to people who need a hand, and prevent the powerful from shitting on the weak. That’s the most basic baseline, and a government that won’t even do that is grounds for revolution.

      1. johnthebasket Avatar
        johnthebasket

        OK, send lawyers, guns and money, the shit has hit the fan.

        jtb

  3.  Avatar
    Anonymous

    I hated a lot of what Kamala stood for, but voted for her anyway. Because I believed that the damage she would do would be far easier to undo later than the damage he would do. Sad that my choice would come down to that. Sometimes I think the “Vote for Cthulhu, why settle for the lesser of two evils” crowd has it down pat.

    1. Doug Holland Avatar

      I already don’t remember what Harris stood for, except the status quo. What was Cthulhu’s platform?

  4. eelparadise Avatar

    I have avoided reading most pundits’ take on the election but I thought I would read yours, and all I can say is don’t give up your day job as bus, restaurant, and movie reviewer. I could be wrong but I found your “analysis” very simplistically out of step with reality. Anyway, you tried, that’s cool, or brave, or something…
    Sorry, no details on what or why I found your review lacking…

    1. Doug Holland Avatar

      I always try to be comfortably “out of step with reality” and I’m glad you noticed. ‘Simplistically’ has to be better than ‘overcomplicated’, so it sounds like a rave review to me!

      1. eel paradise Avatar
        eel paradise

        haha, good one!

  5. Leon Sphinx Avatar
    Leon Sphinx

    Well I for one am EXCITED about Nancy Pelosi’s presidential campaign in 2028!

    1. johnthebasket Avatar
      johnthebasket

      While Nancy slumbers a well-earned sleep, look for the possibility of Elissa Slotkin in 2028 getting elected as the first Jewish US President. She’s not as progressive as you’d like, but she’s a solid Democrat who got elected to the US Senate in a state Trump won.

      John

      1. Doug Holland Avatar

        Get back to me in a few years, maybe I’ll wuss out like always, but right now a “solid Democrat” is of no interest to me.

    2. Doug Holland Avatar

      Maybe she can get the endorsement of half the current Trump appointees, along with old reliable Liz Cheney.

      1. johnthebasket Avatar
        johnthebasket

        Names. Names. I’ve seen all that is wrong with every possible candidate out here, but not one name of a candidate who has even a slim chance of getting a nomination. Actually, any chance at all. We can piss and moan for four years, and I can moan with the best of them, but somebody needs to actually run for office. Just a rending of garments doesn’t move anybody forward. Not WHAT: send everybody a thousand dollars, but WHO?

        jtb

        1. Doug Holland Avatar

          There are 4-6 Democrats who have something going on in their heads and hearts. I’d vote for any of them. None of them would be allowed within sniffin’ distance of the nomination. Only boring, middle-of-the-road candidates need apply.

          If there’s ever a solution, it won’t come from the Democratic Party.

          1. johnthebasket Avatar
            johnthebasket

            Can you name a couple? This isn’t a quiz; I’m curious. Obviously, they have to meet reasonable age requirements. Bernie’s a mensch, but too old. Who’s on your list? (They have to be reasonably electable or they’re not candidates. But that net stretches wide. Carter was the unknown pro-integration Governor of Georgia.)

            jtb

            1. Doug Holland Avatar

              Bernie’s not a Democrat so he doesn’t count. And yeah, he’s too old. So’s Jerry Nadler.

              On my list … Mark Pocan, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Tlaib, and that’s about it. There are 435 members of Congress, most unknown to me, and some few more of them are probably decent people.

              I don’t know from ‘electable’, though.

              1. Johnthebasket Avatar
                Johnthebasket

                Bernie caucuses with the Democrats, gets appointed to committees by the Democrats, and generally votes with the Democrats. He prefers the label “Independent” after his name, which is fine by me. But I never confuse him with a Republican.

                John

                1. Doug Holland Avatar

                  So who’s on *your* list, of Democrats who have something going on in their heads and hearts besides their own re-election?

  6. johnthebasket Avatar
    johnthebasket

    You’re getting Social Security and I’m getting Medicare because of Roosevelt, Truman and LBJ. Pretty close to socialized medicine. You got another one of those guys up your sleeve?

    jtb

    1. Doug Holland Avatar

      All those guys are long-dead, like the Democratic Party.

      1. johnthebasket Avatar
        johnthebasket

        Yeah, they’re all dead. That’s why I asked whether you had another one up your sleeve. And in a democratic republic, electivity is a relevant characteristic. If you want them appointed, you have to ask yourself, who’s going to appoint them?

        John

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 512 MB. You can upload: image, audio. Drop file here

Comments with attachments or multiple links are held for manual approval.