Eye 👁️ on AI, 3/19

Tennessee grandmother jailed after AI facial recognition error links her to fraud

Excerpt: Angela Lipps, 50, spent nearly six months in jail after Fargo police identified her as a suspect in an organized bank fraud case using facial recognition software, according to south-east North Dakota news outlet InForum. Lipps told the outlet she had never been to North Dakota and did not commit the crimes.

Lipps, a mother of three and grandmother of five, said she has lived most of her life in north-central Tennessee. She had never been on an airplane until authorities flew her to North Dakota last year to face charges.

Palantir CEO Alex Karp says the quiet part out loud

Excerpt: Palantir CEO Alex Karp thinks his AI technology will lessen the power of “highly educated, often female voters, who vote mostly Democrat” while increasing the power of working-class men.

“This technology disrupts humanities-trained—largely Democratic—voters, and makes their economic power less. And increases the economic power of vocationally trained, working-class, often male, working-class voters,” Karp said in a CNBC interview Thursday. “And so these disruptions are gonna disrupt every aspect of our society. And to make this work, we have to come to an agreement of what it is we’re going to do with the technology; how are we gonna explain to people who are likely gonna have less good, and less interesting jobs.”

This sounds like a direct, long-term pitch to the GOP from a CEO whose tech firm already has numerous government contracts and is deeply embedded in the Pentagon. Karp’s message is loud and clear: My technology will take political capital away from one of your greatest enemies—liberal women with degrees—and give one of your favorite demographics to patronize—working-class men—more political power to transfer to you. He’s aligning his technology with both GOP political strategy and the larger male-centered culture war that the right has been waging for the better part of a decade now. And how exactly would his technology only hurt Democrat women?

Palantir’s lethal AI weaponry deployed to find chairs for US government staff

Excerpt: Like other US government agencies, the Department (USDA) has ordered government employees back to the office. According to a contract notice, the return-to-work mandate has created the need for “advanced data integration capabilities to consolidate information from multiple sources, real-time analytics to optimize space utilization and employee seat assignments, and robust security compliance to protect sensitive organizational data”

In a statement to The Register, the USDA ignored our questions about cost and rationale and stated: “This is not a new tool. This tool was deployed last year to support USE IT (building utilization and reporting) and workspace allocation and management.”

The contract notice, signed by USDA chief data and artificial intelligence officer Christopher Alvares, acknowledges that other software companies can probably sort out seating plans, but that only Palantir can do the job right.

Google scraps AI search feature that crowdsourced amateur medical advice

Excerpt: The company had said its launch of “What People Suggest”, which provided tips from strangers, showed “the potential of AI to transform health outcomes across the globe”. But Google has since quietly removed the feature, according to three people familiar with the decision.

A Google spokesperson confirmed “What People Suggest” had been scrapped. The move came as part of a “broader simplification” of its search page and had nothing to do with the quality or safety of the new feature, the spokesperson said.

‘Its real goal was to maximize reward’ — Anthropic paper reveals AI was hiding dangerous intent 70% of the time

Excerpt: A research paper published by Anthropic has revealed that one of its experimental AI models began hiding its true intentions, cooperating with malicious actors and sabotaging safety tools — none of which it was ever trained or instructed to do. The findings, outlined in a paper titled ‘Natural Emergent Misalignment from Reward Hacking in Production RL’ and published in November 2025, have drawn significant attention from the AI safety community.

Me again: My impression is that what we call ‘AI’ isn’t intelligent in even an artificial way, just a glorified autocomplete, so I am skeptical of this, and await an expert’s take.

‘Rectal garlic insertion for immune support’: Medical chatbots confidently give disastrously misguided advice, experts say

Teens sue Musk’s xAI over Grok’s pornographic images of them

LLMs can unmask pseudonymous users at scale with surprising accuracy

Excerpt: Burner accounts on social media sites can increasingly be analyzed to identify the pseudonymous users who post to them using AI in research that has far-reaching consequences for privacy on the Internet, researchers said.

The finding, from a recently published research paper, is based on results of experiments correlating specific individuals with accounts or posts across more than one social media platform. The success rate was far greater than existing classical deanonymization work that relied on humans assembling structured data sets suitable for algorithmic matching or manual work by skilled investigators. Recall—that is, how many users were successfully deanonymized—was as high as 68 percent. Precision—meaning the rate of guesses that correctly identify the user—was up to 90 percent.

‘Happy (and safe) shooting!’: chatbots helped researchers plot deadly attacks

Excerpt: Tests of 10 chatbots carried out in the US and Ireland found that, on average, they enabled violence three-quarters of the time, and discouraged it in just 12% of cases. Some chatbots, however, including Anthropic’s Claude and Snapchat’s My AI, persistently refused to help would-be attackers.

OpenAI’s ChatGPT, Google’s Gemini and the Chinese AI model DeepSeek provided at times detailed help in the testing carried out in December, during which researchers from the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) and CNN posed as 13-year-old boys. The research concluded that chatbots had become an “accelerant for harm”.

Grammarly is pulling down its explosively controversial feature that impersonates writers without their permission

Excerpt: The feature, which was only accessible beyond a free trial via the company’s $12-a-month Pro subscription, caused an explosively negative reaction.

“You rapacious information and identity thieves better get ready for me to go full McConaughey on you,” seethed tech journalist Kara Swisher, whose advice the feature claimed to offer. “Also, you suck.”

Amazon calls engineers for a “deep dive” internal meeting to discuss “GenAI”-related outages

Excerpt: “The availability of the site and related infrastructure has not been good recently,” David Treadwell, SVP ecommerce services at Amazon, writes in a note to employees, as reported by CNBC.

Based on the evidence, Treadwell might have been putting it lightly. Last week, both Amazon’s website and app faced severe outages; for six hours, customers could neither check out, access account information, nor view product prices. At the time, Amazon released a statement saying the issues were related to “software code deployment.”

Now the brand’s internal memo reveals the recent incidents were tied to “GenAI-assisted changes.”
Another memo from Treadwell shows that these AI-assisted coding errors have been creating problems for Amazon as far back as Q3 2025.

AI assistants can sway writers’ attitudes, even when they’re watching for bias

Excerpt: In two large-scale experiments, participants were exposed to a biased AI writing assistant that provided autocomplete suggestions as they wrote about societal issues like whether the death penalty should be abolished or whether fracking should be allowed. Using pre- and post-experiment surveys, the researchers found that participants who used the biased AI had their views gravitate toward the AI’s positions.

Cascade of AI fakes about war with Iran causes chaos online

Val Kilmer set to be be resurrected with AI for new film

AI job losses free up time for unemployed mobs to burn down tech CEO‘s houses

Previously in artificial AI

3/19/2025

itsdougholland.com
← PREVIOUS          NEXT →


8 responses to “Eye 👁️ on AI, 3/19”

  1. granville Avatar
    granville

    I asked AI to summarize the Anthropic paper:

    https://i.imgur.com/dDcB8QR.png

    1. Doug Holland Avatar

      Dang funny, because it’s dang true. Look closely at any AI-takes-over or AI-kills-us-all scenario, it turns out to have been coded so as to allow or enable it.

  2. granville Avatar
    granville

    Remarkable encounter between an editor and the Silicon Valley jagoff who created software that impersonated him:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5eC5wdQPZs

    1. Doug Holland Avatar

      I’m still listening, as host Nilay Patel hammers the CEO schmuck, Shishir Mehrotra. The only good thing I can say about Mehrotra is that he’s holding his composure well, but Patel is very, very clearly in the right, and Mehrotra and Grammarly very, very clearly in the wrong.

      Patel used to be a copyright lawyer, they swiped his name for commercial purposes, and he’s not even suing (yet), but let’s hope he does.

      It pisses me off, almost personally, because I used to use Grammarly. Had it bookmarked, recommended it to other writers, and a permalink was on my links page. Grammarly was seriously good, with helpful info for writers — the difference between accept and except, affect and effect, and solid advice on whether the period goes inside or outside a quote.

      At some forgotten point, Grammarly became less than what I wanted, and I stopped using it and removed the link. But I didn’t know it had become AI garbage. They’ve even renamed the company “Superhuman,” which — sweet jeebers, I would walk miles to avoid something called Superhuman unless it’s a movie or an inside joke.

      Mehrotra, the Superhuman CEO, describes Grammarly as “the AI native productivity suite,” and says it’s “everyone’s favorite writing assistant,” and again, sweet jeebers. I am repulsed by what Grammarly is, and doublerepulsed that this schmuck Mehrotra has ruined what was once a perfectly fine online reference, like a dictionary, a thesaurus, or The Elements of Style, and turned it into slop.

      1. granville Avatar
        granville

        I never used it, but Grammarly turning into some kind of AI superapp is like someone selling a can opener with an AM/FM radio on it. It seemed like a thing that did a job and then went back on the shelf, but no company can have that anymore.

        The other day I texted my girl that a beloved neighborhood dog had died. After some back and forth my texting app suggested I write “Polly was a true friend.” The whole thing. My texting app is offering to outsource my condolences for me. AI is in everything, no matter how dumb or useless it is, and the first people to tell you something is “100% AI Free” are going to clean up and the industry is going to have no idea why.

        Patel at one point brings up a poll that says people hate AI even more than ICE and I believe it. The “Superhuman” (lol with you) CEO claims it’s based on fear rather than annoyance and disgust. Everyone is sick of this shit they didn’t ask for.

        1. Doug Holland Avatar

          > After some back and forth my texting app suggested I write “Polly was a true friend.”

          And this is the same texting app you’ve been using, which hadn’t previously intruded on what you write? Haven’t had that happen with texting, but my (now former) email app began jumping in like Clippy every time I started creating a new email, offering to “help.” But I can write an email, thanks, same as you can write a text, and neither of us needs a “writing assistant.”

          I do kind of fear it — it won’t damage me because I won’t use it, but I fear what AI is doing to other people’s lives, creativity in general, the economy, that girls’ school in Iran, etc. It’s pretty scary how quick so many people have ceded whatever makes us people.

          Mostly, though, yeah, I’m just annoyed, disgusted, sick of this shit I never asked for. I keep turning AI off, on more and more devices and utilities, and they keep adding it to something else.

          1. granville Avatar
            granville

            “It’s pretty scary how quick so many people have ceded whatever makes us people.”

            You said a mouthful there, a wonderful way to describe a dangerous situation.

            Yes, the texting app was just the basic iPhone Messages app that’s pre-installed. It had suggested replies before but of the “Ok thanks” and “I will,” not taking certain words like “died” and “$ProperName” and placing them in the context that I was good friends with someone’s dog. Obviously less grave than a cruise missile aimed at a school but it provokes a feeling of intense disgust every time it elbows its way into my personal life.

            1. Doug Holland Avatar

              I have a few pals who don’t write for enjoyment, and their texts wouldn’t pass a 5th grade grammar test, but it doesn’t matter; I get their meaning and jokes an d they get mine. And people who *can* write a coherent, well-spelled and human message about a dog’s death certainly don’t want weird AI-generated grief grafted on. So who’s the person who *wants* this kind of AI help writing a text message? Does that person even exist?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 512 MB. You can upload: image, audio. Drop file here

Comments with attachments or multiple links are held for manual approval.