My old pal Steve

Several lives ago in the 1980s and ’90s, I was an umpire, working slow-pitch softball games for adult tavern leagues.

As someone who enjoys baseball/softball, it was fun work (a joyous oxymoron) because you’re being paid to watch a ball game, and you get the best view in the park, jogging around and trying to be on top of every play. For extra fun, some players took it too seriously and hollered hilariously when (they thought) I’d gotten the call wrong.

In my summers calling balls and strikes and being yelled at, I became friends with Steve, another umpire. He was a counterculture sort, with a tilted outlook and irreverent attitude. We laughed at each others’ jokes, which I sometimes think is the meaning of life.

The leagues were run by cheapskates, so only one umpire was assigned for most games, but for the playoffs or upper league play, two umps were on the field. This led to the highest compliment of my umpiring career: Steve was the most senior ump at a tournament one weekend, which by tradition gave him first pick of who’d be his partner. The umpire-in-chief started reading a list of the other umps working that tournament, and the first name he read was mine. “Say no more,” Steve said. “If Holland is here, I’m working with Holland.”

After that, Steve & I probably worked fifty games together over the years. I don’t remember whether this was his idea or mine, but at the ground-rules meeting with both teams’ managers before the game, we started introducing ourselves as brothers. “I’m Doug Holland, and this is my brother Steve,” or vice versa. Usually the managers believed us, but the visual punchline was that Steve was skinny as anorexia, and I was fat as a gourd. Still am.

Steve had a wicked sense of humor, and between innings we’d stand side-by-side at the foul line and discreetly insult the players or tell jokes. He chewed garlic during the games because it made him stink, so players were less likely to argue with him, but to me he smelled like spaghetti for dinner. Which often happened, after the games.

Steve was a man of mystery, though. He never wanted to talk about his past. A few times in small talk, I asked such probing, personal questions as, “Were you raised here in Seattle?” His answer was only a smile and, “I don’t talk about that.” After a few asks without answers, I understood, respected his wishes, and never asked again.

The lack of asking brought us closer. Inspired by the scent of garlic, we went for Italian food after the games, any time we worked at the same sports complex on the same night. In the off-season we sometimes went to the movies or a basketball game. Can’t say I knew Steve well, because knowing him well wasn’t allowed, but I loved the guy.

Haven’t seen him since ’91, when I quit umpiring and drove my van into the sunset to invent a new life for myself in San Francisco. To some extent, Steve was why that idea popped into my head, and I became a man of mystery like him.

It’s been a great life, but the mystery is pretty much over. I returned to Seattle a few years back, and I’m old and retired, all my best friends are dead, so sometimes it’s a little lonely.

This morning, I suddenly realized I’d never yet searched the internet to see if I could find Steve, to offer him a beer and a plate of spaghetti and an evening talking about old times. The moment the thought hit me, I typed his name into a search box.

And I should’ve known. After all, I’m in my late 60s, and Steve was a few years older. What I found was Steve’s obituary. He died 14 years ago. Cripes, he was only 57. Hit by a damned truck.

Even in my sudden sadness, though, I smiled at this line from his obit. I’ll paraphrase instead of quoting it, so you can’t search and find him; Steve’s privacy mattered to him, and I still respect that.

… Little is known about Steve’s life before he moved to Seattle in 1979. Whenever anyone asked, he would simply smile and say, “I’d rather not talk about that.

The ball game is over for Steve, and it’s almost over for me. To my friend and fake brother and inspiration, farewell and thank you, and let’s meet for pizza sometime soon.

3/4/2026

Obituaries

itsdougholland.com
← PREVIOUS          NEXT →


9 responses to “My old pal Steve”

  1. granville Avatar
    granville

    What a guy. And you can guess he probably wasn’t a crook or in some way notorious, or he would have just come up with a passable if not elaborate backstory.

    I saw a documentary awhile ago about a dementia clinic in the UK. Apparently it had once been standard practice to gently but firmly remind patients of facts when they departed from reality and imagined they were still 18 or confused their husband with Chuck Woolery. Apparently this place just let them go ahead, within reason — they didn’t correct them if it didn’t hurt anybody. So they had repeated coming home parties for the guy who believed he was still a 20 year old sailor, etc. I don’t know if it helped anyone, maybe the play acting made these people feel even worse later during moments of lucidity, but at least on camera they seemed happier being humored than being chastised.

    That’s my excuse, because in my head everyone in the past is still existing there in eddies, alternate dimensions or dioramas with perfectly preserved youth living in the eternal ’80s or ’90s. I like to imagine there’s an oasis and they’re all still there, I’ve just been away for awhile. It’s not a good feeling when reality intrudes and proves that they’re older and I’m older and none of us will make it out alive, but like the patients, what is it really harming?

    1. Doug Holland Avatar

      Yes by golly and absolutely. If no harm is being done by a delusion, then harm *is* being done by repeatedly debunking it.

      Hmmm, not sure about that as an absolute, but it’s gotta be true for you and your oasis, or for some guy who vividly believes he’s Marilyn Monroe.

      Even the dame who imagines she’s married to Chuck Woolery, or the old duffer who believes he’s still a young sailor — I’m skeptical that such people need to be institutionalized. What’s the harm, other than the institutionalization? Mr Woolery is dead, so she could have his photo on her dresser and cherish her fake memories. And maybe the old dude could work again as a sailor, instead of being in an asylum.

      As for Steve, he was poor like me, so he probably hadn’t masterminded a bank heist. My belief is that he, like me, had a situation he wanted to get away from, and got away, and started over, and he lived happily ever after until the truck.

      1. granville Avatar
        granville

        It’s been a few years (and like you mentioned about The Big Lebowski, I watched this with someone I loved who was a nurse and she cried through most of it, I’m not sure I’m willing to revisit that part to rewatch it), but it stood out to me that they weren’t all old, or very old. Some had early onset dementia. One I remember still had a husband who visited constantly. I would guess that their dementia wasn’t limited to just cheerful delusions, though. A big thing is fear of being robbed and the paranoia being reinforced because in many cases they DO have co-signers to their accounts if they haven’t signed over power of attorney. I had a landlord with dementia and boy oh boy was that an experience. He was still calling me 8 months after I mercifully moved out to ask about the keys I gave to his brother on the day I left. And then calling 8 months and a day after I moved out because he didn’t remember calling me the day before.

        1. Doug Holland Avatar

          Yeah, right you are. I was talking out my blowhole, and shouldn’t have. Someone mentally malfunctioning might be at risk. Lemme withdraw on that and put it in the same category as pulling the plug after brain death, gender-affirming therapy for trans kids, or anything else involving medical care. It’s a decision for the patient, the family, and the doctors, but not anyone else’s business unless there’s evidence of abuse.

          Re your nurse love, that’s what I fear. The Big Lebowski has always been a movie I laughed at, and sure as Shinola I don’t want it to become a movie I cry at.

          1. granville Avatar
            granville

            Story I read awhile ago about Stephen Glass, who was one of the most infamous fabulists in modern journalism. That was a long time ago, notorious people have to work too, and he works as a paralegal (he is banned from taking the bar exam).

            Anyway, it’s about his wife too, she tested positive for some kind of gene that leads to early onset dementia or something like that — her mother had died of it — yet told him that she didn’t care: she knew it was coming but she wanted to live her life, and she didn’t want to be reminded of it or change anything in any way. So a guy famous for lying, and his wife who said she wanted him to basically go along with her regardless of how out of touch with reality she became.

            Probably one of the best stories I can remember reading in years, my guess is the paywall and limited audience prevented most people from seeing it:

            https://airmail.news/issues/2021-12-4/loving-lies

            1. Doug Holland Avatar

              It’s not quite behind a paywall, but an email address is required, which aggravates me enough that yeah, it’s a paywall to me.

              Hell of an article, thank you. I’ll be reprinting the whole text on my next “browser history” page.

              Mr Glass’s sins against journalism were major, and it seems fair that he could never be a journalist again. I’d wager that more than zero “unnamed sources” in any day’s news are made up, but Glass did it by the gross ton.

              Ah, but what’s the point of life if not redemption? He’s dedicated his post-scandal life to telling the truth, so life hands him a wild card that requires him to lie, over and over, to the person he loves. Twilight Zone stuff, except it’s true. Well, I hope.

              Fuck the Bar Association for keeping him “not an attorney.”

              The movie of Glass’s story, Shattered Glass, has been on my watchlist for a year or so, since someone I respect recommended it. Maybe it was you? I’ll watch it soon. The article could make for a pretty compelling sequel.

              Gotta quibble a bit at the author, though, Bill Adair. He founded PolitiFact, the fact-checking site that sometimes needs to be fact-checked. I simply don’t look at PolitiFact any more, honestly don’t trust them, because (at least, as of a few years ago) they debunk Republicans and Democrats at an equal, balanced pace.

              I remember some debate, and here’s PolitiFact to the rescue, explaining that the Republican lied that climate change is a hoax and immigrants are all terrorists. But there was dishonesty at the Democrat’s podium too, because the candidate impromptu cited some obscure labor statistic at 46% when it’s actually 42%.

              Both sides do it, both sides do it. And I abhor “Both sides do it” journalism.

              Also, what’s this slight smear: “When he graduated, he got a job at the New Republic, at the time an influential journal of the center left.” Has New Republic stopped being an influential journal of the center left?

              1. granville Avatar
                granville

                I honestly can’t remember ever visiting Politifact though I must have, the whole “fact checking” trend was so tedious and I’m glad everyone who participated in handing out “pinnochios” and shit are now ridiculed. “Trump is a fucking liar and you’re going to piss on his grave one day” is an adequate response, I don’t need druids with extraordinary levels of student debt to “break it down” and imply his opponents are perhaps just as bad.

                lol yeah New Republic just kind of exists now. At the time it was undoubtedly influential (actually all these magazines had to be, because none of them ever made money). Antony Blinken was an intern.

                It was basically a mix of Clintonite domestic policies with a neo-con pro-war and pro-Israel stance, and presided over by a nitwit named Marty Peretz who married a rich heiress, used her fortune to fund it and then cheated on her with his boyfriends. It’s a weird little world that’s almost forgotten now. I might have recommended “Shattered Glass,” it’s an okay movie (limited by Hayden Christiansen’s belief that raising his voice into a sustained whine is an adequate technique for an actor to express “anxiety”) but a pretty accurate window into that world where magazine articles could be super-important, maybe even world-changing things, and everyone involved in creating them did so with the solemnity that they could be. That was the context for Glass’ crimes.

                New Republic held on for awhile, believing it was some “third way” in politics that we could have universal health care but also skull-fuck every brown country on earth, until about 10 years ago. That’s a funny story too. Mark Zuckerberg’s college roommate became intensely wealthy when the company went public (his main contribution to Facebook was the invention of the “poke” button. I’m serious.) He left the company to work for the Obama campaign in 2008, and afterward he was shopping around the Hudson Valley looking for a district where his husband could run for Congress and win a seat using his fortune. Along the way he bought the New Republic to provide some intellectual heft to his moves. He hired some kind of Gawker-like figure as his new editor in chief, and announced all of those potentially world changing magazine articles were just “content” and were going to be treated as such. Like the entire magazine resigned, almost everyone revolted, to the point that I think they were incapable of publishing a couple of issues for the first time since WWI or something like that. He eventually sold it again, and it is what it is, it no longer has that bizarre ’90s “Democratic neo-con” outlook, it’s just a thing that looks good on a resumé among some people over 50 but only if the person with the resumé is also over 50…

                1. Doug Holland Avatar

                  Factchecking as a *separate* department or function is simply a bad idea. Politicians’ statements should be fact-checked in the main coverage, not in some sidebar or at a specialized website only for wonks.

                  I wouldn’t go so far as to say Bill Adair is the problem, but you just can’t have a healthy democracy (look around!) when the top story is “US attacks Iran to prevent nuclear buildup” and then there’s some think piece a few days later examining the [utter lack of] evidence for such a claim.

                  Intriguing backstory you’ve supplied, thanks. Anthony Blinken. Small world, with small people.

                  And all of this, from Glass to Zuck’s roommate, would’ve been while the internet was blooming but not yet pukeified, so “writer for New Republic” prolly sounded impressive and maybe was.

                  The backstory is mostly news to me. Maybe I wasn’t reading New Republic back then. It’s a dull, stupid name for a magazine, and for years I confused it with National Review, which is its effective opposite.

                  The present-day New Republic is in my surf cycle, not for the articles (ordinary punditry and news you can find anywhere) but for its blurring of news and editorial, and *especially* for the headlines, which carry a bite of truth & cynicism rarely found elsewhere in corpse journalism. At the moment, for example, it’s “White House Says Trump Will Decide When Iran Has Really Surrendered” and “Netanyahu Finally Found a President Willing to Buy Into His Iran Dream.”

            2. Doug Holland Avatar

              PS. Good news, I don’t have to risk a dreaded cease and desist letter from Air Mail magazine. Found the article in its entirety already posted at Reddit.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 512 MB. You can upload: image, audio. Drop file here

Comments with attachments or multiple links are held for manual approval.