Visit to a food bank

I’d contributed in the past, but it’s more a blessing to receive than to give, so yesterday was my first visit to a food bank.

I was expecting a bureaucracy, with forms to be filed, ID and citizenship and income to be confirmed, but it was the most pleasant surprise since April gave me a blow job circa 1982.No questions asked.You simply walk in, and the place is laid out like the world’s smallest convenience store. You grab a handheld basket, and take what you need.My main hope was for some bread, but the bread shelf was empty (I should’ve come earlier in the day). The other shelves had plenty, though, and I got all the canned goods I usually have at home — corn, peas, chicken soup, sliced peaches, etc.Then, just like in a store, you bring your basket to a cashier for bagging, only the cashier doesn’t have a cash register and there’s no paying. She simply bagged my groceries, we exchanged some brief pleasantries, and I rode the bus home.This is the way a charity should work — no hassles, no humiliation, only help — so my sincere kudos and thanks and a rave review for the Sodo Community Market, a service of Northwest Harvest. ♦ ♦ ♦ 

CRANKY
OLD FART

#424  [archive]
MAY 21, 2024

Donald Trump is your dumbass wingnut uncle — a doofus with a head full of dumb opinions he loudly shares about everything, always wrong and always mean.That’s all he is, but he was born rich, had money all his life, so nobody’s ever told him to shut up or slugged him in the nose.Being the world’s most famous loudmouth know-nothing, about 40,000,000 dumbass wingnut uncles made him President once, and might again.

Powered by AI in Windows 11, Microsoft has proudly announced ‘Recall’, which “records everything users do on their PC, including activities in apps, communications in live meetings, and websites visited for research.”For, you know, reference purposes? They’re calling this a ‘feature’, but it’s a venomous bug. Who would want their computer tracking and remembering and taking screenshots every few seconds, always?

This article at The Atlantic, New 9/11 evidence points to deep Saudi complicity,
seems painfully naïve. It’s surprised right from the top that decades
of claims that al-Qaeda alone was behind the attacks of 9/11/2001 might
not be true. Puh-lease. Haven’t we known this for about twenty-three
years?Here’s the excerpt that got my attention:Astonishingly,
the attacks of 9/11 had little effect on the Saudi approach to
religious extremism, as diplomats and intelligence officials have
attested. What finally changed royal minds was the experience of
suffering an attack on Saudi soil. In May 2003, gunmen and suicide
bombers struck three residential compounds in Riyadh, killing 39 people.
The authorities attributed the attacks to al-Qaeda, and cooperation
with the U.S. improved quickly and dramatically.
① There’s
nothing ‘astonishing’ here. Saudi Arabia is a monstrous theocracy and in
no sense an ally of anything any sane American would want. But mostly ② the paragraph in its entirety is again naïvely accepting whatever ‘authorities’ say — in this case, that al-Qaeda did another dastardly deed.Much more likely, that attack on Saudi soil was planned and/or executed by the CIA or some US agency you’ve never heard of, and blamed on al-Qaeda. RIP, 39 people, but America got the policy cooperation it wanted, and to America, that’s all that matters.Any
evidence for such charges, Doug? Nah, just a lifetime’s experience
watching how the US government conducts its ‘foreign affairs’.

Japanese Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi says kooky Republican Senator Lindsey Graham’s call for nuking Gaza is “extremely regrettable.” And the Japanese know a thing or two about such things.

From vaccines to smoking to climate change, news reports about scientific matters usually say that scientists “believe” instead of scientists “know” something. Seems a tiny thing, but that word choice adds a measurable element of doubt for ordinary people, even on matters where there’s no doubt at all. 

I bought a lot of superhero comics when I was a kid, mostly DC but with a smattering of Marvel, and I even subscribed to a few titles, like Detective Comics (Batman) and Fat Fury.
But jeez, it’s wacky to learn that DC and Marvel jointly hold a trademark on the very word ‘superhero’. Thank Zeus, someone’s suing to overturn this.

♫♬ MUSIC YOU SHOULD HEAR ♫    Blowin’ in the Wind
by Bob Dylan
     God Is A Freak
by Peach PRC
     Industrial Disease
by Dire Straits
     Take Me to the River
by The Eurythmics
     The World is a Beautiful Place
by Lawrence Ferlinghetti
 

⚰️  DEAD PEOPLE  ⚰️ Ivan Boesky
just another capitalist Robert Dennard
dynamic random-access memory Ebrahim Raisi
son of a bitch

 
 5/21/2024   

Cranky Old Fart is annoyed and complains and very occasionally
offers a kindness, along with anything off the internet that’s made me
smile or snarl. All opinions fresh from my ass. Top illustration by Jeff Meyer. Click any image to enlarge. Comments & conversations invited. Tip ‘o the hat to the AVA, BoingBoing, Breakfast at Ralf’s, Chuff, Dirty Blonde Mind, It Seemed Like a Good Idea at the Time, Lemmy.world, Looking for My Perfect Sandwich, Miss Miriam’s Mirror, Mr Souza’s Happy Place, Voenix Rising, and anywhere else I’ve stolen links, illustrations, or inspiration.Special thanks to Linden Arden, Becky Jo, Wynn Bruce,
Joey Jo Jo emeritus, Jeff Meyer, John the Basket, Dave S, Name Withheld, and always extra
special thanks to my lovely late Stephanie, who gave me 21 years and
proved that the world isn’t always shitty.

Cranky Old Fart
← PREVIOUS          NEXT →

itsdougholland.com
← PREVIOUS           NEXT →


22 responses to “Visit to a food bank”

  1. Garlic Radish Avatar
    Garlic Radish

    Have you noticed that all suburban neighborhoods and empty parking lots feel creepy and uncomfortable, and everything looks the same everywhere? It's because everything in the USA is designed for cars, not for people.

    The few places for people are always on thoroughfare for cars, so everywhere you are, you're either in a car or surrounded by cars. All of America is a place to drive through, more than a place to drive to, and much more than a place to be.

    1. Doug Holland Avatar

      I hate cars, you know. I hate the noise, the pollution, the physical waste of resources, and sure, I hate that I can't take a half-mile walk to the library without being car-conscious on every sidewalk and especially at every intersection. I hate being a passenger in cars, having known two people whose rides ended in death, and I hate being around cars, having known three people killed by cars despite having the pretended right-of-way.

      But I hadn't much noticed how car-culture has uglified everything everywhere. Valid point.

      Give me a train, cars are a pain.

  2. granville Avatar
    granville

    Apparently mentioning head makes this is a "sensitive post" according to Blogger.

    1. Doug Holland Avatar

      For as long as I've been blogging, every post where I've used the word blowjob has caused Sundar Pichai to blush. They're all hidden behind the shock warning, but in the past they've always reconsidered when I followed their prudish "appeals" process. This time, no response, so I guess it's the first X-rated food bank.

    2. granville Avatar
      granville

      Was watching youtube the other day and a guy refused to say the name of an actor because "you know why." It was Arnold Schwarzenegger, and he wouldn't say it because Google would automatically pick it up, misunderstand it, and demonetize if not age-restrict their video. This is the world that is replacing the last one, where people couldn't say "asshole" on network TV but could at least say Schwarzenegger.

    3. Doug Holland Avatar

      I become more and more concerned about this. AI, I call it, but it predates the current pandemic of AI apps. Yeah, more and more of what we humans do is judged by some piece of software.

      And it's getting worse. Like, Google has tacked on that warning to make people wonder and worry about this page, and certainly some people don't cross that barrier, so they'll never see this page. Google has done this with every page I've ever written that included the word blowjob. The difference is, with every page until this one, I've clicked a few buttons to get a human to look at the page, and the barrier was lifted within a few hours. I don't think the humans have that job any more — there's been no response — so this page will always have the barrier, unless I remove the blowjob joke. And I ain't doing that.

      Same with the job hunt. I don't remember who explained it to me — might've been you, Granville — but my résumé, well-crafted as if is if I say so myself and I do — is no longer being seen by humans, because it lacks the accepted catchphrase.

      More and more, I think more and more people are going to be running into more and more barriers like this, more and more often, and it more and more sucks.

    4. granville Avatar
      granville

      Yup, that was me. There's something to be said about the use of technology in history to cut labor's throat, which will be the most practical application of AI (the self-driving car's greatest use will be to put Teamster members out of a job and hire someone for minimum wage not to "drive" but "put their hands on the wheel.") Another was to simply alienate labor — Thomas Jefferson's dumbwaiter meant he and his brainy guests no longer had to look at black slaves while eating. But the biggest use will be the simultaneous automation of shitwork that nobody cares about (transcribing minutes of meetings, developing wordy reports that nobody actually wants to read — all the stuff that the late, great David Graeber wrote about in "Bullshit Jobs") and erecting these barriers for no other reason than dealing with 200 job applicants or 200 customers with broken phones requires significant labor. But 20 job applicants (the rest eliminated by AI?) or 20 customers with broken phones (the rest having given up and solved the problem themselves or keep using them without the broken functionality)? That's savings. That's problem-solving at its finest.

      ALL OF THE WARNING SIGNS ARE THERE! The stories keep getting published every day about how bad this is — not in a "destroy the world" way but "whoa we're really just using an elaborate autocomplete here and no I did not mean to order 'ham and gays' for breakfast" way. Here's one I just saw a minute ago:

      https://futurism.com/the-byte/study-chatgpt-answers-wrong

      The only hope we have is that this sloppy bullshit is being used for the Bullshit Jobs, and not for, like, a machine that keeps grandma alive. Fingers crossed!

    5. Doug Holland Avatar

      Well, yeah, but even the bullshit jobs are jobs, or used to be. Bullshit work puts real food into real bellies, and if the choice is between bullshit jobs and unemployed hunger I'll stick with bullshit. As I have, in my own life, I reckon.

      But yessir, the advantages of AI are for the people who already have all the advantages.

      You sure as sunset know more about it than I do, so lemme ask: Are you against it? Against, to the point that it should not be allowed?

      I'm against it, to the point that it should be as heavily regulated as guns ought to be heavily regulated, which is six-tons heavily.

      Interesting article behind that link, but I'm wary when the complaint is how shitty and inaccurate AI is. With smart people working on it, it'll get less shitty and less inaccurate. What it won't get is less wrong, morally and societally.

      I see it as the end of art, music, and writing as a way to make a living, not for everyone — there'll always be a few artists, famous and doubtless assisted by AI — but the end of it as a dream for ordinary humans who make art, music, and writing.

    6. granville Avatar
      granville

      Commercial art is probably a lost cause except for prestige clients, but art for the sake of art is something that AI will probably be unable to replace. Like all modesty aside, no AI could replace you. The people who are reading your blog are reading it for reasons that AI could not possibly replicate. It doesn't understand humor, it doesn't understand irony, it doesn't understand soulfulness or being as happy as getting a blowjob (we're already censored here, let's go with it). Anyone who enjoys reading sees through AI-generated shit in seconds. I have been very wrong in overestimating people's interest in reality before, though.

    7. Doug Holland Avatar

      I will try to quietly nudge all the kind thoughts to some back corner of my mind, maybe keep 'em handy in case of depression, but otherwise never think of them again.

      Certainly agree that art for art's sake is in minimal danger. Humans have a creative itch to us. Art-for-a-living, though, will be available to far fewer people than the few it's been available to, which was always few.

      We can see through AI-created writing now, but my pessimistic prediction is, AI will get better and continue to get better, until it's unrecognizable for what it is. Random House will license the name Agatha Christie, and AI will write the next generation of best-sellers.

    8. johnthebasket Avatar

      I wonder how AI will do with humor and wordplay. That would seem to be the most difficult areas to co-opt.

      John

    9. Doug Holland Avatar

      Most jokes are old jokes. Same with wordplay. When AI has mined everything, it'll seem downright clever.

  3. granville Avatar
    granville

    Also one of the more cynical parts of the original BBC "House of Cards" is that almost every IRA attack is actually carried out by the government. At one point there's an explosion and Ian Richardson looks up from his papers, turns to the camera and notes "Not one of ours, I'm afraid."

    1. Doug Holland Avatar

      Wow, that's pretty dang shocking for a show on big-time TV, BBC and all. Every time I watch BBC, even if I don't particularly care for the show, it feels like it's for intelligent grown-ups, unlike most of American TV.

  4. Claude Reigns Avatar
    Claude Reigns

    Also, I don't think you've mentioned it, but please tell me you've been using Basic Food/EBT? I was on it like 15 years ago, and it was 200 bucks a month then.

    1. Doug Holland Avatar

      It's stupid of me, but no. I am seriously unwigged by any charity and especially any government agency demanding that I prove my poverty. That's why I don't and probably won't have Medicare, Medicaid, and whatever Basic Food/EBT is (food stamps?).

      Not like some people who "refuse to take charity." I'm fine with taking charity when it's needed, and appreciate a helping hand. But I don't want the help if the hand wants to see my lease, my bank account, my work and tax and marital history, etc.

  5. johnthebasket Avatar

    Doug, good call using the food bank. All the years I was working we contributed to a couple of local food banks and now we're closer than I'd like to be to needing a withdrawal. I'm sure that next time you need some chow you'll get there early for a piece or two of fruit. Is April still available for a celebration?

    John

    1. Doug Holland Avatar

      April, my long-ago ex-girlfriend? No, she's not available for nothing with me, but I wish her well.

      If you ever do need a food bank, Northwest Harvest has my highest rating — BIG YES. I don't remember any fruit except canned, but there was lettuce and lots of big baking potatoes. I would've grabbed a few taters but I don't have any tin foil at the moment.

  6. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    I got about halfway through my treatise on Texas-based early rock when the Googs wiped the whole thing out. I'm sure I hit a key in error, but one key shouldn't destroy an hour's work. I'll be gone most of tomorrow, but sometime soon I'll just write you an email with the material in it and ask you to post it for me. It's way too fragile out here to try to include a dozen links and half of Texas history in one post.

    John

    1. Doug Holland Avatar

      Sounds like a plan, and I'm happy to do it.

      Also sounds like stupid software design, if striking the wrong key — a simple typo — wipes out everything.

      I have a similar complaint about Libre, the open-source alternative to Microsoft Word that I've been using for years. Works great, but there's one mystery typo that switches an entire document into some other mode that baffles me; I can still type, but can't backspace, delete, or edit anything. I don't know what the command is that I've accidentally typed, don't know how to undo it, and the document is effectively destroyed.

      So once a month or so, I make that typo, but from experience I know what to do — copy the entire document as plain text, create a new document and paste the entire old document into it, and delete the old document, since I'll never be able to use it again.

      Just seems like one typo shouldn't be able to do such damage. As I'm sure you'll agree.

  7. Anonymous Avatar
    Anonymous

    I received a warning before visiting this entry today, seems like Google doesn't like your opinions. 🙂

    1. Doug Holland Avatar

      I don't think Google cares about my opinions, honestly. I'm too small a fry to be worrisome to them in any way, and anyway, I generally like the platform they're letting me publish on, so I gotta accept their stupid terms.

      Only thing Google cares about, so far as the warning anyway, is that I've used a naughty word — blowjob, blowjob, blowjob.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 512 MB. You can upload: image, audio. Drop file here

Comments with attachments or multiple links are held for manual approval.