Death on a floating bridge

I’m an infrastructure geek, intrigued by the planning and architecture and design that lets millions of people live and get around in a geographically small urban area. If you don’t share that enthusiasm, skip this entry.

Evergreen Point Floating Bridge
across Lake Washington

The city of Seattle is built on an isthmus, with Puget Sound to the west, and Lake Washington, 20 miles long and two miles wide, to the east. Swanky suburbs are on the other side of the lake, and several bridges cross the water.

Because of the lake’s setting, depth, and its soft bottom, suspension bridges are impractical here. Instead, the lake’s bridges are of an unusual design. They’re constructed of hollow concrete squares, called pontoons, which float, and support the weight of the highway and the traffic.

Today’s story takes place on the Evergreen Point Floating Bridge, or as it’s more formally known, Governor Albert D. Rosellini Bridge. Fun fact: It’s the longest floating bridge in the world. Another fun fact: The second-longest floating bridge in the world is nearby, on the same lake.

Water traffic on Lake Washington is almost entirely pleasure boating, and smaller craft can cross under the bridge’s approaches, at either shore. There’s not enough clearance, though, for big sailboats and other taller vessels, so schooners and yachts queue near the drawspan, in the middle of the bridge.

Opening the drawspan is a complicated process that halts traffic for half an hour, so there are no bridge openings during rush hour Monday-Friday. When it’s needed, though, lights flash, bells sound, guardrails come down, and cars and trucks and buses stop, much like at a railroad crossing.

One section of the bridge, about 100 feet long, is designed to hydraulically hoist itself up and out of the water. Once it’s standing at about a man’s height, that section slides backward, on top of the adjacent section of the bridge. This leaves clear sailing below, allowing boats to pass, usually accompanied by a chorus of flipped fingers and foul language from people in the vehicles backed up in both directions.

When the water traffic has sailed away, the raised section of the highway slides back over the water, and is gently lowered to sea level. Employees wearing vests and walkie-talkies doublecheck, making sure everything has clicked as it’s supposed to, and that the pavement is perfectly aligned. Then the guardrails are removed, and highway traffic resumes.

It’s brilliant engineering, but like everything else in modern life, once you’re accustomed to it you take it for granted. So what happened on December 22, 1989 came as quite a surprise.

The drawspan section,
with the deck raised about halfway

Nobody knew except the workers, but every Friday morning the bridge’s drawspan mechanism was tested — while traffic rolled across the bridge. First and always, the power settings were dialed back, so there wouldn’t be enough juice to operate any of the machinery. Only a few volts would be sent along the command wires, just enough impulse power to be measured, and show that the system was functional.

In hindsight, this may have been less than the best possible protocol.

Investigators established that the bridge crew did nothing wrong. The power was at its minimum level, and nothing should’ve happened. But something happened.

Without guardrails in place, with lights not flashing and bells not sounding, 100 feet of the freeway suddenly rose out of the water.

Quoting from coverage in the New York Times:

The drawspan lifted about four and a half feet, creating a wall that three vehicles drove into head-on. Several cars were left perched on the elevated section of the bridge, some with blown tires and mangled metal from hitting the rising span. None of the cars went into the water.

It’s a freeway, speed limit 55 mph, so it’s surprising that only one person was killed — Raili Korkka, a 44-year-old Seattle woman. Her family must’ve hired a remarkably incompetent lawyer, as their lawsuit was settled three years later, with the state paying just $100,000. In a separate lawsuit, the state paid $1.9-million to someone who’d survived, but hired a better attorney.

I lived in Seattle in 1989, and drove that bridge frequently. I’d driven across it the day before. When it’s local and peripherally personal, you don’t forget, so the end of that lady’s story pops into my mind now and again.

She never knew what happened. She was just driving along, when the highway in front of her became a wall. It was nobody’s fault, just a crazy confluence of ordinary events, with a wild card dealt in. And you know, there is always a wild card.

8/26/2021
Republished 1/8/2025

itsdougholland.com
← PREVIOUS          NEXT →


12 responses to “Death on a floating bridge”

  1. Jordan Avatar
    Jordan

    "Be careful out there."

    1. Doug Holland Avatar

      It's beyond that, though. Something like this, no amount of "careful" can protect you.

  2. Russ Kelley Avatar
    Russ Kelley

    This is not the kind of post I expect on this blog. You do that a lot. I mean that as a complement. You are a good writer.

    1. Doug Holland Avatar

      Well, shucks, I try — thank you.

  3. Peter D. Avatar
    Peter D.

    Quite a ride.

    1. Doug Holland Avatar

      Surprise ending.

  4. sprunki Avatar

    I don’t know which will come first, the accident or tomorrow

    1. Doug Holland Avatar

      Dang. That’s hitting me like a wall coming up from the bridge.

  5. Orson Avatar
    Orson

    Your remark, “Her family must’ve hired a remarkably incompetent lawyer, as their lawsuit was settled three years later, with the state paying just $100,000. ” is inaccurate.

    Under Washington State law at that time, Korkka’s estate was entitled to a maximum award of $100,000 as she was a single person without any dependents.

    1. Doug Holland Avatar

      But no limit on what a survivor could get? Not that I doubt it, but that is some strange lawmaking.

      1. Orson Avatar
        Orson

        The idea I suppose was that the single person died without dependents or direct beneficiaries. Sort of like if a single person dies without a will (intestate) and the state steps in to claim their funds in probate.

        1. Doug Holland Avatar

          I am happy to not understand such considerations, but I’ve heard that juries are instructed to considered a dead person’s “lifetime earnings potential” in awarding damages. Which always seems cold and capitalist to me. And it’s extra unjust to have it written into law, basically an acknowledgement that in death same as in life, money is what determines a human’s value. Do you know if the law applied only in government liabilities, like the bridge oopsie, or was there a limit in corporate liability payouts too?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 512 MB. You can upload: image, audio. Drop file here

Comments with attachments or multiple links are held for manual approval.